Corporate LawLast updated: 2026-11-084 min readPublic-source summary

METI Steps Up Japan-EU Comparison of Japan's JC-STAR IoT Security Labelling Scheme and the EU Cyber Resilience Act: Cooperation MoU Signed (Announced 4 November 2026)

This article compiles what Japanese government bodies have published, together with the statutory text. Links to the primary sources are included. For a specific matter, pleasecontact us.

Key Takeaways

  • ✓On 4 November 2026 METI (jointly with IPA) announced that Japan-EU cooperation on comparing the JC-STAR scheme with the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) is being stepped up
  • ✓On 26 October 2026 the Japan Business Council in Europe (JBCE), which runs the CRA-JC-STAR Technical Working Group (TWG), and the EU-funded StandICT.eu secretariat signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU)
  • ✓METI and IPA say they will work with JBCE, the StandICT.eu secretariat and European cybersecurity experts to step up the comparison and analysis of the two schemes and their specific security requirements
  • ✓According to the release, the CRA entered into force in December 2024, its vulnerability and incident reporting obligations have applied since September 2026, and its main cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements are due to apply from December 2027
  • ✓The release says IPA has operated JC-STAR since March 2025, and that mutual recognition with the UK PSTI regime began in January 2026 and with Singapore's Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme (CLS) in June 2026

Not sure how this applies to your situation? Ask a lawyer — the first 30 minutes are free.

Share this article

On 4 November 2026 Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) published a news release announcing that Japan-EU cooperation on comparing the JC-STAR scheme with the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) is being stepped up. The release was issued jointly with the Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan (IPA).

JC-STAR (in Japanese, the "security requirements conformity assessment and labelling scheme") is Japan's scheme for assessing and labelling the security of IoT products. The CRA is the EU law that imposes cybersecurity requirements on products with digital elements.

This page sets out what METI published.

Overview

ItemDetails
Date of release4 November 2026
Issued byMETI (jointly with IPA)
Date of signingMonday 26 October 2026
PartiesJapan Business Council in Europe (JBCE) and the StandICT.eu secretariat
Document signedMemorandum of understanding on Japan-EU cooperation on cybersecurity regulation and standardisation
FrameworkCRA-JC-STAR Technical Working Group (TWG)
Next stepsMETI and IPA, with JBCE, the StandICT.eu secretariat and European experts, to step up comparison and analysis of the two schemes and their security requirements

What was signed

The release states that on 26 October 2026, in Brussels, Belgium, JBCE, which runs the TWG, and the EU-funded StandICT.eu secretariat signed a memorandum of understanding. The TWG is the framework for a technical comparison of JC-STAR and the CRA. The section of the release on the date of signing states that the signing took place online.

StandICT.eu is a digital technology standards project funded under the EU's Horizon Europe research and innovation framework. The release says the TWG is run by JBCE together with StandICT.eu and Cyberstand.EU.

Under the memorandum, JBCE and StandICT.eu are to:

  • Support the comparison of the security requirements of JC-STAR and the CRA and the identification of similarities and differences
  • Promote dialogue between European and Japanese experts by hosting meetings
  • Support continued exchanges between the two sides

METI and IPA take part in the TWG, and Japanese and EU experts are to compare the two schemes while fully respecting the regulatory autonomy of each jurisdiction. The release says it expects the similarities and differences between the schemes to be clarified, creating an environment in which Japanese companies can respond efficiently to cybersecurity rules in Japan and abroad.

Free Tool Related to This Article

Contract Risk Checker

Try our free simulator related to this topic.

Try for free →

Dates for the two schemes given in the release

SchemeDate stated in the release
METI policy on building a security conformity assessment scheme for IoT productsPublished August 2024
JC-STAR (operated by IPA)In operation since March 2025
Mutual recognition between JC-STAR and the UK PSTI regimeBegan January 2026
Mutual recognition between JC-STAR and Singapore's Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme (CLS)Began June 2026
Entry into force of the CRA (EU)December 2024
CRA vulnerability and incident reporting obligationsApplying from September 2026
CRA main cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elementsDue to apply from December 2027

As background, the release notes that IoT products such as routers, network cameras and sensors have spread rapidly, while cyberattacks exploiting vulnerabilities in IoT products have also increased.

Attorney Yusuke Abe

FREE CONSULTATION

Corporate Law: your first 30 minutes are free

  • ・Handled by Yusuke Abe, admitted in Japan and New York
  • ・Online (Zoom etc.) or at our office in Otemachi, Tokyo
  • ・In English or Japanese

Workshops held so far

The release lists the following workshops on comparing and analysing JC-STAR and the CRA.

FrameworkSessionDate and format
INSTAR1st10 November 2025 (online)
INSTAR2nd27 January 2026 (Brussels, hybrid)
INSTAR3rd9 June 2026 (online)
StandICT.eu1st14 September 2026 (online)

The release notes that INSTAR is an EU project on international digital standardisation cooperation, which has since been taken over by StandICT.eu.

Next steps

The release says Japan will continue building a system in which IoT products designed with security in mind from the outset become widespread, and will share information with relevant bodies with a view to cooperation with other countries that have similar schemes. It says this will help Japanese companies deal with international regulatory requirements more smoothly and raise the level of cybersecurity of IoT products worldwide.

METI and IPA also take part in the Global Cyber Labelling Initiative (GCLI), an international forum of countries interested in cybersecurity schemes for IoT products, according to the release.

Sources

  • METI, news release on Japan-EU cooperation on comparing JC-STAR and the EU Cyber Resilience Act (4 November 2026, in Japanese) https://www.meti.go.jp/press/2026/11/20261104002.html
  • IPA, JC-STAR page (in Japanese) https://www.ipa.go.jp/security/jc-star/index.html

This page is based on what the government published and on the wording of the relevant laws. If you need advice on a specific matter, please consult a lawyer.

Free Tools for This Area

Share this article
This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal issues, please consult with a qualified attorney.

More Legal News

Related Articles

Personal Data Breach Notification in Japan: APPI Obligations and Response Procedures

Japan's mandatory breach notification obligations under the amended APPI: which incidents trigger reporting, timelines, content requirements, and best practices.

Can You Commercially Use Generative AI Output in Japan? Copyright Article 30-4 and Output-Stage Risk

A guide for businesses on whether generative AI output can be used commercially in Japan: Article 30-4 of the Copyright Act and its proviso, the similarity and reliance test at the output stage, how training data affects reliance, when AI-generated material is protected by copyright, injunctions, damages and criminal penalties, and steps you can take now.

Entering Japan as a Foreign Company: Representative Office, Branch or Subsidiary, and the Governing Law of Your Contracts

How a foreign company can enter Japan through a representative office, a branch or a subsidiary, explained against the Companies Act: the ban on continuous transactions before registration, the representative in Japan, KK versus GK, governing law and jurisdiction clauses, Foreign Exchange Act filings, and the October 2025 changes to the Business Manager status of residence.

Acquiring or Investing in a Japanese Company: Prior Notification and Post-Investment Reports under Japan's Foreign Exchange Act

How Japan's Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act applies when a foreign company buys shares in, or invests in, a Japanese company: who counts as a foreign investor, the one-share rule for unlisted companies and the 1% threshold for listed ones, designated sectors and prior notification, the 30-day waiting period and its extension, the prior-notification exemption and core sectors, 45-day post-investment reports, and the reform taking effect on 4 January 2027.

Buying a Japanese Company: Share Transfer vs Business Transfer, and What Due Diligence Covers

For companies, including overseas buyers, acquiring a small or mid-sized Japanese company: how a share transfer differs from a business transfer under the Companies Act, the Civil Code and the Antimonopoly Act, and MHLW guidelines. Approval of transfers of restricted shares (Companies Act, Articles 136-139 and 145), delivery of share certificates (Article 128), the special shareholder resolution for a business transfer (Articles 467 and 309(2)(xi)) and dissenting shareholders' appraisal rights (Article 469), the seller's non-compete (Article 21), liability where the trade name is continued (Article 22), individual employee consent (Civil Code, Article 625(1)), JFTC prior notification and the usual scope of legal due diligence.

Japan APPI Data Breach Reporting for Foreign Companies: Extraterritorial Reach, Deadlines and Notifying Individuals

Foreign companies that supply goods or services to people in Japan can be bound by Japan's data breach reporting duty even without a Japanese office. This guide covers extraterritorial reach, the four reportable situations, the preliminary report (roughly 3–5 days) and final report (30 days, or 60 days for wrongful-purpose incidents), notifying individuals, penalties and the amending act promulgated in July 2026.

Related Q&A

Related reading

Corporate Law

Can You Commercially Use Generative AI Output in Japan? Copyright Article 30-4 and Output-Stage Risk

A guide for businesses on whether generative AI output can be used commercially in Japan: Article 30-4 of the Copyright Act and its proviso, the similarity and reliance test at the output stage, how training data affects reliance, when AI-generated material is protected by copyright, injunctions, damages and criminal penalties, and steps you can take now.

Corporate Law

Entering Japan as a Foreign Company: Representative Office, Branch or Subsidiary, and the Governing Law of Your Contracts

How a foreign company can enter Japan through a representative office, a branch or a subsidiary, explained against the Companies Act: the ban on continuous transactions before registration, the representative in Japan, KK versus GK, governing law and jurisdiction clauses, Foreign Exchange Act filings, and the October 2025 changes to the Business Manager status of residence.

Corporate Law

Acquiring or Investing in a Japanese Company: Prior Notification and Post-Investment Reports under Japan's Foreign Exchange Act

How Japan's Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act applies when a foreign company buys shares in, or invests in, a Japanese company: who counts as a foreign investor, the one-share rule for unlisted companies and the 1% threshold for listed ones, designated sectors and prior notification, the 30-day waiting period and its extension, the prior-notification exemption and core sectors, 45-day post-investment reports, and the reform taking effect on 4 January 2027.

Corporate Law

Buying a Japanese Company: Share Transfer vs Business Transfer, and What Due Diligence Covers

For companies, including overseas buyers, acquiring a small or mid-sized Japanese company: how a share transfer differs from a business transfer under the Companies Act, the Civil Code and the Antimonopoly Act, and MHLW guidelines. Approval of transfers of restricted shares (Companies Act, Articles 136-139 and 145), delivery of share certificates (Article 128), the special shareholder resolution for a business transfer (Articles 467 and 309(2)(xi)) and dissenting shareholders' appraisal rights (Article 469), the seller's non-compete (Article 21), liability where the trade name is continued (Article 22), individual employee consent (Civil Code, Article 625(1)), JFTC prior notification and the usual scope of legal due diligence.

Corporate Law

Japan APPI Data Breach Reporting for Foreign Companies: Extraterritorial Reach, Deadlines and Notifying Individuals

Foreign companies that supply goods or services to people in Japan can be bound by Japan's data breach reporting duty even without a Japanese office. This guide covers extraterritorial reach, the four reportable situations, the preliminary report (roughly 3–5 days) and final report (30 days, or 60 days for wrongful-purpose incidents), notifying individuals, penalties and the amending act promulgated in July 2026.

Corporate Law

Setting Up a Company in Japan: Kabushiki Kaisha (KK) vs Godo Kaisha (GK) — Differences, Costs and Procedure

A comparison of Japan's two main company forms, the kabushiki kaisha (KK) and the godo kaisha (GK): formation costs, governance, profit distribution, transfer of interests and public notice of accounts, with the steps to incorporate and points to consider when choosing.

Attorney Yusuke Abe

Free 30-min consultation

Talk to a lawyer about the issues in this article

Yusuke Abe, admitted in Japan and New York, will handle your matter — in Japanese or English, online or in person.

Book a free consultation