Corporate LawLast updated: 2026-11-0514 min readLawyer-Reviewed

Buying a Japanese Company: Share Transfer vs Business Transfer, and What Due Diligence Covers

Key Takeaways

  • ✓In a share transfer only the shareholder changes; the company itself, with its contracts, employees, permits and liabilities, stays as it is. In a business transfer the buyer takes over the assets, contracts and employees it selects, one by one
  • ✓Buying restricted shares requires the company's approval, decided in principle by the board of directors if the company has one and otherwise by the shareholders' meeting (Companies Act, Article 139(1)). If the company gives no notice within two weeks of the request, approval is deemed given (Article 145(i))
  • ✓For a company that issues share certificates, a transfer of shares takes effect only on delivery of the certificates (Companies Act, Article 128(1)). Check the articles of incorporation and whether certificates have actually been issued
  • ✓A company transferring all or an important part of its business needs approval of the contract by special resolution of its shareholders by the day before the effective date (Companies Act, Articles 467(1) and 309(2)(xi)). Dissenting shareholders can demand that their shares be bought (Article 469)
  • ✓To move employees in a business transfer, each employee's individual consent is needed (Civil Code, Article 625(1); MHLW guidelines). Counterparties to contracts must also consent (Civil Code, Article 539-2)
  • ✓Share acquisitions and business acquisitions above certain sizes must be notified to the Japan Fair Trade Commission in advance (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 10(2) and 16(2)). Foreign exchange filings are a separate question

Not sure how this applies to your situation? Ask a lawyer — the first 30 minutes are free.

Share this article

There are two main ways to buy a Japanese company: a share transfer and a business transfer. In a share transfer only the shareholder changes; the company itself, with its contracts, employees, permits and liabilities, carries on as before. In a business transfer the buyer takes over selected assets, contracts and employees one by one, which requires the consent of each counterparty and each employee (Civil Code, Articles 539-2 and 625(1)). The choice affects the corporate approvals you need, the risks you inherit and where due diligence should focus.

When this comes up

  • Your overseas headquarters wants to buy a Japanese customer or competitor by acquiring its shares
  • The owner says "I'll sell you the shares, just change the name in the register", but the articles of incorporation restrict share transfers
  • You want to buy only one division of a loss-making company, but you do not know whether the employees and customers will come with it
  • You have signed heads of terms and your team has not yet agreed what due diligence should cover

The difference is what you are buying

In a share transfer, the buyer acquires the shares and becomes the shareholder. The company remains the same legal entity, so its contracts with customers, its employment contracts, its permits and its liabilities, including those not on the balance sheet, generally stay with the company. The process is relatively contained, but you take on the company's risks as a whole.

In a business transfer, the buyer purchases a business, meaning a set of assets, contracts, know-how and so on, from the selling company. The buyer can choose by contract what it takes over. In exchange, each contract, employee and permit has to be moved individually, which takes time and effort.

In practice, a share transfer is the usual starting point if you want the whole company, and a business transfer if you want a particular division or set of assets. The final choice depends on off-balance-sheet risk, whether permits must be re-obtained, how likely employees are to consent, tax and other factors.

Free Tool Related to This Article

Contract Risk Checker

Try our free simulator related to this topic.

Try for free →

Share transfers: check the transfer restrictions and share certificates

Most small Japanese companies restrict share transfers

Shareholders may transfer their shares (Companies Act, Article 127). But a company may provide in its articles of incorporation that acquiring its shares by transfer requires the company's approval (Article 107(1)(i) and (2)(i)). Such shares are called restricted shares (Article 2(xvii)). In unlisted small companies, it is common for all shares to be restricted.

A shareholder who wants to sell restricted shares can ask the company to decide whether it approves the buyer's acquisition (Article 136). The buyer can also make the request, but generally jointly with the shareholder shown in the shareholder register (Article 137).

Who approves, and what if approval is refused

If the company has a board of directors, the board decides; otherwise the shareholders' meeting does, unless the articles provide otherwise (Article 139(1)). The company must notify the requesting party of its decision (Article 139(2)). If it gives no notice within two weeks of the request, or any shorter period set in the articles, approval is deemed given (Article 145(i)).

If the company refuses but the request asked the company to buy the shares in that case, the company or a buyer it designates must purchase them (Articles 138 and 140). Without approval, a buyer generally cannot ask for the shareholder register to be updated in its name (Article 134). A share transfer cannot be asserted against the company or other third parties unless it is entered in the shareholder register (Article 130(1)).

In practice, the parties usually arrange for the approval resolution to be passed before closing, with a copy of the minutes delivered before the price is paid.

Share certificates must be delivered where they are issued

A company whose articles provide for share certificates is called a company issuing share certificates (Articles 117(7) and 214). For such a company, a transfer of shares takes effect only when the certificates are delivered (Article 128(1)). Older companies sometimes still have this provision in their articles even though no certificates have actually been issued. Check the articles and the certificate position early and agree with the seller how to deal with it.

Business transfers: special resolution and individual transfers

The seller needs a special shareholder resolution

A company transferring all of its business, or an important part of it, must have the transfer agreement approved by resolution of its shareholders' meeting by the day before the effective date (Companies Act, Article 467(1)(i) and (ii)). This is a special resolution: shareholders holding a majority of the voting rights (reducible to one third by the articles) must be present, and two thirds of the votes of those present must be in favour (Article 309(2)(xi)).

Where part of a business is transferred and the book value of the assets transferred does not exceed one fifth of the company's total assets (or a lower ratio set in the articles), the transfer is excluded from this approval requirement (Article 467(1)(ii)). Approval is also unnecessary where the buyer is a special controlling company holding nine tenths or more of the seller's voting rights (Article 468(1)).

The buyer may also need approval

A company acquiring the whole of another company's business also generally needs approval by its shareholders' meeting (Article 467(1)(iii)). This is not required where the book value of the consideration does not exceed one fifth of the buyer's net assets (or a lower ratio set in the articles) (Article 468(2)). Even then, if shareholders holding a certain number of shares notify their opposition, a shareholder resolution is required (Article 468(3)).

Dissenting shareholders' appraisal rights

A company carrying out a business transfer must notify its shareholders at least 20 days before the effective date (Article 469(3)). Dissenting shareholders may demand that the company buy their shares at a fair price (Article 469(1)). There are exceptions, such as where the shareholders' meeting that approves the transfer of the whole business also resolves at the same time to dissolve the company (Article 469(1)(i)). If the seller has minority shareholders besides the owner, plan for this possibility.

Employees and contracts move one by one

In a business transfer, employment contracts do not move automatically. An employer cannot assign its rights to a third party without the worker's consent (Civil Code, Article 625(1)). The MHLW guidelines on business transfers likewise state that individual consent is needed from each employee expected to transfer. They say the transferor should explain the overall situation fully and consult with employees with a view to obtaining their consent, and that if working conditions are to be changed on transfer, consent to that change is also needed. A dismissal solely because an employee refused to consent is treated as an abuse of rights and not permitted (Labor Contract Act, Article 16).

Contracts with customers and suppliers work the same way. Transferring a party's position under a contract requires the other party's consent (Civil Code, Article 539-2). Whether key customers, landlords and licensors will consent can become a condition of the deal. Whether a permit or licence passes automatically in a business transfer depends on the law that governs it, and in some cases it must be obtained again.

For what to watch if you do not take over some employees, or need to reduce headcount at the Japanese company, see "Dismissing an Employee in Japan".

Obligations of the seller and the buyer in a business transfer

The seller's non-compete

Unless the parties agree otherwise, a company that has transferred its business must not carry on the same business in the same municipality or adjacent municipalities for 20 years from the date of the transfer (Companies Act, Article 21(1)). If the parties agree that the seller will not compete, the agreement is effective only for up to 30 years from the transfer (Article 21(2)). In either case, the seller must not carry on the same business for the purpose of unfair competition (Article 21(3)).

For overseas buyers, the statutory scope of 20 years and the same and adjacent municipalities often does not fit the actual business. It is common to set the territory, duration and scope of the restriction expressly in the contract.

Continuing the seller's trade name can make the buyer liable for its debts

If the buyer continues to use the seller's trade name, it is also liable to pay the debts arising from the seller's business (Companies Act, Article 22(1)). This liability does not arise if, without delay after the transfer, the buyer registers at its head office location that it is not liable for the seller's debts. The same applies to any third party to whom the buyer and seller have given notice to that effect (Article 22(2)).

Even without continuing the trade name, if the buyer advertises that it assumes the seller's debts, the seller's creditors can claim against the buyer (Article 23(1)). And if the seller transferred the business knowing that this would harm creditors whose claims were not taken over, those creditors can claim performance from the buyer up to the value of the property it acquired, unless the buyer did not know of the harm when the transfer took effect (Article 23-2(1)).

Japan Fair Trade Commission and foreign exchange filings

Share acquisitions above certain sizes must be notified to the Japan Fair Trade Commission in advance (Antimonopoly Act, Article 10(2)). Under the current thresholds, notification is required where the buyer's group has total domestic sales exceeding JPY 20 billion, the target and its subsidiaries have total domestic sales exceeding JPY 5 billion, and the buyer's voting rights will exceed 20% or 50% (Antimonopoly Act Enforcement Order, Article 16). A company that has filed generally may not acquire the shares until 30 days have passed from the date the filing is accepted (Article 10(8)).

There is also prior notification for business acquisitions, for example where the buyer's total domestic sales exceed JPY 20 billion and the domestic sales of the business acquired exceed JPY 3 billion (Article 16(2); Enforcement Order, Article 21).

When an overseas company or investor acquires shares in a Japanese company, prior notification or a post-transaction report under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act may be required. The answer depends on the business sector and the shareholding, so see "Acquiring or Investing in a Japanese Company under the Foreign Exchange Act".

What due diligence covers

Due diligence (DD) is the buyer's investigation of the target before the acquisition. It is not required by law; the parties decide how far to go depending on the size of the deal and the risks. Legal DD typically looks at:

  • Corporate records: articles of incorporation, the commercial register, the shareholder register and minutes of shareholders' and board meetings, including the transfer-restriction and share-certificate provisions and whether past share issues and transfers were properly approved
  • Key contracts: whether supply, lease, licence, loan and similar contracts let the counterparty terminate, or require its consent or notice, on a change of control or a transfer of the business
  • Employment: employment contracts and work rules, unpaid overtime, employment disputes and, in a business transfer, which employees are to move
  • Permits and licences: which permits the business depends on, and whether a change of shareholder or a business transfer requires a filing or a new permit
  • Litigation: pending or threatened lawsuits and any administrative guidance or sanctions
  • Intellectual property: whether trademarks, patents and software belong to the company and whether the business infringes third-party rights
  • Personal data: how customer and employee personal information is managed, and the purposes stated when it was collected

Under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information, a person receiving personal data provided in connection with the succession of a business by merger or otherwise is not treated as a third party (Article 27(5)(ii)). The successor may not, without the individual's consent, handle that information beyond what is necessary for the purposes of use that applied before the succession (Article 18(2)).

Representations and warranties are a contractual tool

Issues found in DD, and matters DD could not fully cover, are dealt with in the share purchase agreement or business transfer agreement. The main tool is representations and warranties, in which the seller confirms in the contract that certain facts about the company or business are true. They are not a statutory regime but contract terms set by the parties. The scope, cap and claim period of the indemnity for a breach are also set by contract. Issues found in DD are reflected in price adjustments, conditions to closing or specific indemnities.

For how we handle transactions overall, see "Mergers & Acquisitions".

What you can do now

  1. Obtain the target's articles of incorporation and check the transfer-restriction and share-certificate provisions
  2. Check the shareholder register and minutes for the current shareholders and past share movements
  3. Decide whether you want the whole company or a particular business, and consider whether to proceed by share transfer or business transfer
  4. List key contracts that need counterparty consent on a change of control or transfer
  5. In a business transfer, agree with the seller which employees will move and how they will be informed and consulted
  6. Check early whether JFTC notification and foreign exchange filings are needed

When to talk to a lawyer

  • Before signing a letter of intent or MOU, when you want to settle exclusivity and confidentiality
  • When the articles provide for share certificates but the certificates cannot be found
  • When a key customer contract lets the customer terminate on a change of control
  • When some of the employees you want to take over in a business transfer are unlikely to consent
  • When your overseas parent asks you to use its English-language share purchase agreement template

Our representative attorney is admitted in Japan and New York and handles transactions in Japanese and English, from drafting the agreements through due diligence to closing.

FREE CONSULTATION

Corporate Law: your first 30 minutes are free

  • ・Handled by Yusuke Abe, admitted in Japan and New York
  • ・Online (Zoom etc.) or at our office in Otemachi, Tokyo
  • ・In English or Japanese

Frequently asked questions

Should we choose a share transfer or a business transfer?

A share transfer is the starting point if you want the whole company, and a business transfer if you want only a particular business or assets. A share transfer is procedurally simpler, but you inherit the company's risks, including off-balance-sheet liabilities. A business transfer lets you choose what to take, but needs individual consent from employees and contract counterparties (Civil Code, Articles 625(1) and 539-2). Compare tax and permits as well before deciding.

Can we buy restricted shares without the company's approval?

The parties can sign a sale agreement, but without approval the buyer generally cannot ask for the shareholder register to be updated in its name (Companies Act, Article 134). If the company has a board of directors, the board generally decides on approval (Article 139(1)). In practice, the approval resolution is passed by closing.

Do employees move to the buyer automatically in a business transfer?

No. Each employee's consent is needed (Civil Code, Article 625(1)). The MHLW guidelines on business transfers say the transferor should explain the transfer fully and consult employees with a view to their consent. A dismissal solely because an employee refused to consent is treated as an abuse of rights and not permitted (Labor Contract Act, Article 16).

In a share transfer, do we need the employees' consent?

In a share transfer only the shareholder changes; the employer, which is the company, stays the same. So no employee consent is needed to move employment contracts. If you plan to change working conditions after the acquisition, however, the usual employment law rules apply. When and how to tell employees is also an important practical question.

Are representations and warranties set by law?

No. Representations and warranties are contract terms the parties agree in the share purchase or business transfer agreement. Which facts are warranted, how far the seller must indemnify a breach and for how long claims can be made are all negotiated. The terms are settled in light of the DD results.

Free Tools for This Area

Share this article
This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal issues, please consult with a qualified attorney.

Related Articles

Acquiring or Investing in a Japanese Company: Prior Notification and Post-Investment Reports under Japan's Foreign Exchange Act

How Japan's Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act applies when a foreign company buys shares in, or invests in, a Japanese company: who counts as a foreign investor, the one-share rule for unlisted companies and the 1% threshold for listed ones, designated sectors and prior notification, the 30-day waiting period and its extension, the prior-notification exemption and core sectors, 45-day post-investment reports, and the reform taking effect on 4 January 2027.

Shareholders' Meeting Procedures in Japan: From Notice to Resolution

Guide to shareholders' meeting procedures in Japan, including notice requirements and resolution types.

Can You Commercially Use Generative AI Output in Japan? Copyright Article 30-4 and Output-Stage Risk

A guide for businesses on whether generative AI output can be used commercially in Japan: Article 30-4 of the Copyright Act and its proviso, the similarity and reliance test at the output stage, how training data affects reliance, when AI-generated material is protected by copyright, injunctions, damages and criminal penalties, and steps you can take now.

Entering Japan as a Foreign Company: Representative Office, Branch or Subsidiary, and the Governing Law of Your Contracts

How a foreign company can enter Japan through a representative office, a branch or a subsidiary, explained against the Companies Act: the ban on continuous transactions before registration, the representative in Japan, KK versus GK, governing law and jurisdiction clauses, Foreign Exchange Act filings, and the October 2025 changes to the Business Manager status of residence.

Japan APPI Data Breach Reporting for Foreign Companies: Extraterritorial Reach, Deadlines and Notifying Individuals

Foreign companies that supply goods or services to people in Japan can be bound by Japan's data breach reporting duty even without a Japanese office. This guide covers extraterritorial reach, the four reportable situations, the preliminary report (roughly 3–5 days) and final report (30 days, or 60 days for wrongful-purpose incidents), notifying individuals, penalties and the amending act promulgated in July 2026.

Setting Up a Company in Japan: Kabushiki Kaisha (KK) vs Godo Kaisha (GK) — Differences, Costs and Procedure

A comparison of Japan's two main company forms, the kabushiki kaisha (KK) and the godo kaisha (GK): formation costs, governance, profit distribution, transfer of interests and public notice of accounts, with the steps to incorporate and points to consider when choosing.

Related Q&A

Related reading

Corporate Law

Entering Japan as a Foreign Company: Representative Office, Branch or Subsidiary, and the Governing Law of Your Contracts

How a foreign company can enter Japan through a representative office, a branch or a subsidiary, explained against the Companies Act: the ban on continuous transactions before registration, the representative in Japan, KK versus GK, governing law and jurisdiction clauses, Foreign Exchange Act filings, and the October 2025 changes to the Business Manager status of residence.

Corporate Law

Japan APPI Data Breach Reporting for Foreign Companies: Extraterritorial Reach, Deadlines and Notifying Individuals

Foreign companies that supply goods or services to people in Japan can be bound by Japan's data breach reporting duty even without a Japanese office. This guide covers extraterritorial reach, the four reportable situations, the preliminary report (roughly 3–5 days) and final report (30 days, or 60 days for wrongful-purpose incidents), notifying individuals, penalties and the amending act promulgated in July 2026.

Corporate Law

Setting Up a Company in Japan: Kabushiki Kaisha (KK) vs Godo Kaisha (GK) — Differences, Costs and Procedure

A comparison of Japan's two main company forms, the kabushiki kaisha (KK) and the godo kaisha (GK): formation costs, governance, profit distribution, transfer of interests and public notice of accounts, with the steps to incorporate and points to consider when choosing.

Corporate Law

Director Liability in Japan: Duties, the Business Judgment Rule, Derivative Suits, and D&O Insurance

A practical guide for executives on directors' duties and liability under Japan's Companies Act: the duty of care and loyalty, the business judgment rule (Apamanshop case), conflict-of-interest approvals, subsidiary oversight, how derivative suits unfold, and liability limitation, indemnification and D&O insurance, with a checklist.

Corporate Law

Labor Compliance for Japanese Companies: Key Regulations and Penalties

Comprehensive guide to labor compliance for Japanese companies, covering key regulations and penalties.

Corporate Law

Intellectual Property Basics in Japan: Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights

Overview of intellectual property rights in Japan: patents, trademarks, designs, and copyrights.

Attorney Yusuke Abe

FREE 30-MIN CONSULTATION

Talk to a lawyer about the issues in this article

Yusuke Abe, admitted in Japan and New York, will handle your matter — in Japanese or English, online or in person.

Book a free consultation