After moving out of a rental after 8 years, I was charged ¥300,000 for full wallpaper replacement. Isn't wear and tear considered?

Question

Accepted Answer

Per MLIT's Restoration Guidelines, normal wear and tear is the landlord's responsibility. Wallpaper has a 6-year useful life; after 8 years, residual value is essentially zero. Charging full replacement for normal use is unjustified. Tenants only pay for intentional/negligent damage (smoking stains, pet damage), reduced by depreciation. The ¥300K charge is likely rejectable. Pursue deposit return (Art. 622-2) via small claims court.

Q. After moving out of a rental after 8 years, I was charged ¥300,000 for full wallpaper replacement. Isn't wear and tear considered?

Related Questions

Q. Can I claim against the seller if a purchased home has defects?

Q. My landlord refused to renew my lease. Do I have to move out?

Q. Can I get my security deposit back when moving out?

Q. I have a boundary dispute with my neighbor. How can I resolve it?

Q. Can I sublease my rented property?

Related Articles

Security Deposit Returns in Japan: What Landlords Can Deduct

Legal Remedies for Defective Housing in Japan

Free Tools