Corporate LawLast updated: 2026-11-046 min readPublic-source summary

Agency for Cultural Affairs Seeks Comment on Draft Copyright Act Enforcement Order and Regulation: Procedures for Secondary Use Fees Payable to Performers and Record Producers When Commercial Recordings Are Played in Public (2 November 2026)

This article compiles what Japanese government bodies have published, together with the statutory text. Links to the primary sources are included. For a specific matter, pleasecontact us.

Key Takeaways

  • ✓On 2 November 2026 the Agency for Cultural Affairs opened public comment on a draft Cabinet Order amending the Copyright Act Enforcement Order and a draft Ministerial Order amending the Enforcement Regulation (case no. 185001515). Comments close on 1 December 2026
  • ✓Under the 2026 amendment to the Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of 2026, promulgated on 24 June 2026), anyone who publicly plays a performance or the sounds of a record using a commercial recording, or publicly communicates them by means of a receiving device when they are transmitted to the public, must pay a secondary use fee to the performers and record producers (amended Articles 95-2, 95-3, 97-2 and 97-3)
  • ✓Playing in public for non-profit purposes without charging the audience, among other cases, is excluded
  • ✓The drafts set out what the business rules of designated collecting bodies must contain, how draft fee schedules are to be published, the criteria for recognising user representatives and the procedure for applying for a ruling
  • ✓The main provisions of the amending Act take effect on a date set by Cabinet Order within three years of promulgation; preparatory steps such as designating collecting bodies and drawing up fee schedules (Supplementary Provisions, Art. 4) took effect on promulgation. The draft orders are to take effect when the amending Act does

Not sure how this applies to your situation? Ask a lawyer — the first 30 minutes are free.

Share this article

On 2 November 2026 Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs published a draft Cabinet Order partially amending the Copyright Act Enforcement Order and a draft Ministerial Order partially amending the Copyright Act Enforcement Regulation, and opened public comment. Comments close on 1 December 2026.

According to the published material, the drafts accompany the entry into force of the 2026 amendment to the Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of 2026). They set out, among other things, the matters needed for the designated collecting bodies and the fee schedules relating to the right of performers and record producers to receive a secondary use fee when commercial recordings are played or communicated in public.

This page sets out what the Agency published, together with the statutory wording.

Overview of the consultation

ItemDetails
Case number185001515
TitleDraft Cabinet Order partially amending the Copyright Act Enforcement Order / Draft Ministerial Order partially amending the Copyright Act Enforcement Regulation
Legal basis (as stated on the case page)Supplementary Provisions, Art. 5 of Act No. 48 of 2026; Art. 95(9) of the amended Copyright Act as applied by Arts. 95-2(4), 95-3(4), 97-2(4) and 97-3(4); and Arts. 95-2(5), 95-3(5), 97-2(5), 97-3(5) and 103-8
Date published2 November 2026
Comment deadline1 December 2026 (must arrive by this date)
Responsible officeCopyright Division, Agency for Cultural Affairs
Planned entry into forceThe date the amending Act takes effect

The new secondary use fee (statutory wording)

Article 95-2(1) of the Copyright Act, as amended by Act No. 48 of 2026, provides that a person who publicly plays a performance using a commercial recording on which the performance is recorded must pay a secondary use fee to the performer.

Amended Article 97-2(1) provides that a person who publicly plays the sounds of a record using a commercial recording must pay a secondary use fee to the producer of that record.

Amended Articles 95-3(1) and 97-3(1) impose the same obligation, in favour of performers and record producers respectively, on a person who publicly communicates, by means of a receiving device, performances or record sounds on commercial recordings that are being transmitted to the public.

Articles 95-2 and 97-2 (playing) exclude, among other cases, playing in public for non-profit purposes without charging the audience (paragraph (2) of each article). Articles 95-3 and 97-3 (communicating) exclude, among other cases, communicating broadcasts, cable broadcasts, specified-input automatic public transmissions or simultaneous online distribution of broadcasts in public for non-profit purposes without charging the audience, and communicating them in public using an ordinary household receiver (paragraph (2) of each article).

Free Tool Related to This Article

Contract Risk Checker

Try our free simulator related to this topic.

Try for free →

When the amending Act takes effect

Article 1 of the Supplementary Provisions of the amending Act provides that the Act takes effect on a date set by Cabinet Order within three years of promulgation, except that Articles 4 and 5 of the Supplementary Provisions take effect on promulgation.

Article 4 of the Supplementary Provisions allows the Commissioner of the Agency for Cultural Affairs to designate the bodies that will exercise the right to the secondary use fee before the Act takes effect, and allows designated bodies to draw up fee schedules in advance. The amending Act was promulgated on 24 June 2026.

FREE CONSULTATION

Corporate Law: your first 30 minutes are free

  • ・Handled by Yusuke Abe, admitted in Japan and New York
  • ・Online (Zoom etc.) or at our office in Otemachi, Tokyo
  • ・In English or Japanese

Main points of the drafts

The summary lists the following main points.

Designated collecting bodies

  • The provisions of Chapter 9, Section 1 of the Enforcement Order (public notice of designation, business rules, accounts, submission of business plans, reporting, suspension or discontinuance of business, revocation of designation) are applied to bodies designated for the secondary use fee
  • The business rules must cover the acceptance of authority to exercise the right to the fee, the handling charges for that business, and the method of distributing the fees

Fee schedules

  • Draft fee schedules are to be published online or by other appropriate means
  • A designated body that publishes a draft must notify the Commissioner without delay, with a notice stating the date and method of publication and attaching the draft
  • The particulars of an application by a user representative for an order to start or resume consultations (name, the designated body concerned, the matters to be consulted on, and how the application came about) are set out
  • Criteria are set for the Commissioner to recognise a "user representative" for a given category of use (for example, where both its share of users and its share of fees paid exceed 50%; where one share exceeds 50% and no one else has more than 50% of the other; or where both exceed 20%, no one else exceeds either share, and no such person is expected to appear)
  • The particulars and supporting documents of an application for a ruling (the history of consultations, prima facie evidence of being a user representative, the basis for calculating the amount, etc.) are set out, together with written notice of the reasons for a ruling
  • Fee schedules are to be published online or by other appropriate means, and a filing must attach a document describing how opinions were heard and how consultations went

Other

  • Filings of fee schedules, business rules and related documents may be made on disc or similar media
  • Transitional measures are provided, such as allowing designated bodies to draw up business rules before the drafts take effect

The fee schedule procedure (statutory wording)

Under amended Article 103-2(1), a designated body must establish a fee schedule stating, among other things, the amount of the secondary use fee for each category of use determined under criteria set by the Commissioner, and the date it takes effect. When establishing or changing a schedule, the body must endeavour to hear the views of users and user organisations (Art. 103-2(2)) and must publish the draft (Art. 103-2(3)).

Under Article 103-3(1), once a draft is published, a user representative may, within one month of publication, ask the designated body to consult on changing the draft. Article 103-5(3) provides that a designated body must not claim a secondary use fee exceeding the amount in the fee schedule it has filed.

Sources

  • e-Gov Public Comment, draft Copyright Act Enforcement Order and Enforcement Regulation amendments (case no. 185001515; consultation guidelines and summary PDFs): https://public-comment.e-gov.go.jp/servlet/Public?CLASSNAME=PCMMSTDETAIL&id=185001515&Mode=0
  • Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of 1970), e-Gov: https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/345AC0000000048

This page is compiled from material published by government agencies and from statutory text. Please consult a lawyer where a decision is needed on a specific matter.

Free Tools for This Area

Share this article
This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal issues, please consult with a qualified attorney.

More Legal News

Related Articles

Can You Commercially Use Generative AI Output in Japan? Copyright Article 30-4 and Output-Stage Risk

A guide for businesses on whether generative AI output can be used commercially in Japan: Article 30-4 of the Copyright Act and its proviso, the similarity and reliance test at the output stage, how training data affects reliance, when AI-generated material is protected by copyright, injunctions, damages and criminal penalties, and steps you can take now.

Entering Japan as a Foreign Company: Representative Office, Branch or Subsidiary, and the Governing Law of Your Contracts

How a foreign company can enter Japan through a representative office, a branch or a subsidiary, explained against the Companies Act: the ban on continuous transactions before registration, the representative in Japan, KK versus GK, governing law and jurisdiction clauses, Foreign Exchange Act filings, and the October 2025 changes to the Business Manager status of residence.

Acquiring or Investing in a Japanese Company: Prior Notification and Post-Investment Reports under Japan's Foreign Exchange Act

How Japan's Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act applies when a foreign company buys shares in, or invests in, a Japanese company: who counts as a foreign investor, the one-share rule for unlisted companies and the 1% threshold for listed ones, designated sectors and prior notification, the 30-day waiting period and its extension, the prior-notification exemption and core sectors, 45-day post-investment reports, and the reform taking effect on 4 January 2027.

Japan APPI Data Breach Reporting for Foreign Companies: Extraterritorial Reach, Deadlines and Notifying Individuals

Foreign companies that supply goods or services to people in Japan can be bound by Japan's data breach reporting duty even without a Japanese office. This guide covers extraterritorial reach, the four reportable situations, the preliminary report (roughly 3–5 days) and final report (30 days, or 60 days for wrongful-purpose incidents), notifying individuals, penalties and the amending act promulgated in July 2026.

Setting Up a Company in Japan: Kabushiki Kaisha (KK) vs Godo Kaisha (GK) — Differences, Costs and Procedure

A comparison of Japan's two main company forms, the kabushiki kaisha (KK) and the godo kaisha (GK): formation costs, governance, profit distribution, transfer of interests and public notice of accounts, with the steps to incorporate and points to consider when choosing.

Director Liability in Japan: Duties, the Business Judgment Rule, Derivative Suits, and D&O Insurance

A practical guide for executives on directors' duties and liability under Japan's Companies Act: the duty of care and loyalty, the business judgment rule (Apamanshop case), conflict-of-interest approvals, subsidiary oversight, how derivative suits unfold, and liability limitation, indemnification and D&O insurance, with a checklist.

Related Q&A

Related reading

Corporate Law

Can You Commercially Use Generative AI Output in Japan? Copyright Article 30-4 and Output-Stage Risk

A guide for businesses on whether generative AI output can be used commercially in Japan: Article 30-4 of the Copyright Act and its proviso, the similarity and reliance test at the output stage, how training data affects reliance, when AI-generated material is protected by copyright, injunctions, damages and criminal penalties, and steps you can take now.

Corporate Law

Entering Japan as a Foreign Company: Representative Office, Branch or Subsidiary, and the Governing Law of Your Contracts

How a foreign company can enter Japan through a representative office, a branch or a subsidiary, explained against the Companies Act: the ban on continuous transactions before registration, the representative in Japan, KK versus GK, governing law and jurisdiction clauses, Foreign Exchange Act filings, and the October 2025 changes to the Business Manager status of residence.

Corporate Law

Acquiring or Investing in a Japanese Company: Prior Notification and Post-Investment Reports under Japan's Foreign Exchange Act

How Japan's Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act applies when a foreign company buys shares in, or invests in, a Japanese company: who counts as a foreign investor, the one-share rule for unlisted companies and the 1% threshold for listed ones, designated sectors and prior notification, the 30-day waiting period and its extension, the prior-notification exemption and core sectors, 45-day post-investment reports, and the reform taking effect on 4 January 2027.

Corporate Law

Japan APPI Data Breach Reporting for Foreign Companies: Extraterritorial Reach, Deadlines and Notifying Individuals

Foreign companies that supply goods or services to people in Japan can be bound by Japan's data breach reporting duty even without a Japanese office. This guide covers extraterritorial reach, the four reportable situations, the preliminary report (roughly 3–5 days) and final report (30 days, or 60 days for wrongful-purpose incidents), notifying individuals, penalties and the amending act promulgated in July 2026.

Corporate Law

Setting Up a Company in Japan: Kabushiki Kaisha (KK) vs Godo Kaisha (GK) — Differences, Costs and Procedure

A comparison of Japan's two main company forms, the kabushiki kaisha (KK) and the godo kaisha (GK): formation costs, governance, profit distribution, transfer of interests and public notice of accounts, with the steps to incorporate and points to consider when choosing.

Corporate Law

Director Liability in Japan: Duties, the Business Judgment Rule, Derivative Suits, and D&O Insurance

A practical guide for executives on directors' duties and liability under Japan's Companies Act: the duty of care and loyalty, the business judgment rule (Apamanshop case), conflict-of-interest approvals, subsidiary oversight, how derivative suits unfold, and liability limitation, indemnification and D&O insurance, with a checklist.

Attorney Yusuke Abe

Free 30-min consultation

Talk to a lawyer about the issues in this article

Yusuke Abe, admitted in Japan and New York, will handle your matter — in Japanese or English, online or in person.

Book a free consultation